COLUMBUS, Ohio – Ohio lawmakers are again trying to block
journalists' access to county sheriffs' records on concealed handgun
permits.
A budget provision added by a state Senate committee Tuesday would
repeal part of Ohio's concealed carry law that allows journalists to
review records on the issuance, renewal, suspension and revocation of
state permits to carry a concealed handgun.
As the public as a whole already is blocked from viewing these
records, the change would mean such records could only be obtained with a
court order.
Under current law, journalists who view concealed handgun records
aren't allowed to bring in writing utensils with them or make copies.
State Sen. Joe Uecker, a southwest Ohio Republican who offered the
amendment, said in an interview that Ohioans have a right to expect that
their private records should remain exactly that – private.
The senator also noted that in recent years, newspapers in Ohio and elsewhere controversially published maps with the names and addresses of gun permit holders, raising concerns that burglars could exploit such information.
"A great number of people believe that that violates their Second
Amendment right, that they have a right to expect privacy with their
CCW," Uecker said.
Uecker unsuccessfully introduced a similar proposal during the last legislative session. He said he's more optimistic the measure will pass this time.
Ohio Newspaper Association Executive Director Dennis Hetzel said he was "disappointed" to see the proposal.
Hetzel said he couldn't think of any instance in which Ohio
journalists have used their ability to access concealed handgun records,
but he said reporters could use such access to, for example, see
whether an armed robber had a conceal-carry permit.
Hetzel also expressed concern that the proposal, if passed, would
result in officials around Ohio maintaining secret databases of public
records.
"The First Amendment should be as important as the Second Amendment," he said.
http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2015/06/gun_permit_records_would_be_of.html
No comments:
Post a Comment