HB 44 is just the first step toward criminalizing ALL private transfers of firearms; in fact, the first version of this bill from the 2013 session did just that. No background check legislation will ever be "universal" since criminals simply ignore the law.
Why You Should Oppose HB 44
It’s an ineffective crime control proposal. In April of 2013, PoliceOne conducted a national survey
of 15,000 active and retired law enforcement officers of all ranks and
department sizes on the topics of gun & crime control. Nearly 80
percent said that a prohibition on private non-dealer transfers of
firearms between individuals would not reduce violent crime.
Current laws are not being enforced.
According to a 2012 report to the U.S. Department of Justice, more than
72,000 people were turned down on a gun purchase in 2010 because they
didn’t clear a background check. Only 44 of those cases – or just .06
percent – were prosecuted. A 2013 study by Syracuse University showed
that gun prosecutions had hit a decade low, down 40 percent from 2004.
Existing laws are not even being enforced and proponents are calling for
expanding background checks to cover private firearms transactions.
Gun shows aren’t a source of crime guns. A U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics survey
of state prison inmates who had used or possessed firearms in the
course of committing their crimes found that 79 percent acquired their
firearms from “street/illegal sources” or “friends and family.” This
includes theft of firearms, black market purchases of stolen firearms
and straw purchases. Only 1.7 percent obtained a firearm at a gun show.
It may lead to gun registration.
Most importantly, because a January 2013 internal U.S. Department of
Justice memorandum summarizing so-called "gun violence" prevention
strategies stated that the effectiveness of "universal background
checks" depends on "requiring gun registration."
Even though HB 44 currently contains prohibitions on the development
of a state or local registry of gun buyers, supporters of the bill are
likely to eventually claim the need to repeal these important
protections in order to enforce its provisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment