Cyber
security expert and Libertarian presidential candidate John McAfee is
alarmed at the potential implications from Apple being forced to create a
virtual backdoor to their encrypted system. In an enlightening op-ed,
McAfee blasts the FBI for its ineptitude, while exposing the archaic
hiring practices of the Feds that create a technology gap between FBI
and private sector capabilities. McAfee makes clear that if the
government gains access, privacy, as we know it, will fail to exist.+
“No matter how you slice this pie, if the government succeeds in getting this back door, it will eventually get a back door into all encryption, and our world, as we know it, is over,” McAfee writes.
The tech guru offers his
teams hacking services to the FBI free of charge, as a means of allowing
the phone in question to be accessed – without allowing the government
to have a backdoor into all iPhones. McAfee would provide the FBI with
the information they claim to seek, while at the same time allowing for
secure encryption to continue to exist – of course there is a distinct
possibility that the actual intention of forcing Apple to create a
backdoor isn’t to access this particular phone, but as a means of
breaking encryption on a global basis.
Read McAfee’s op-ed to the FBI below:
Using
an obscure law, written in 1789 — the All Writs Act — the US government
has ordered Apple to place a back door into its iOS software so the FBI
can decrypt information on an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino
shooters.
It has finally come to
this. After years of arguments by virtually every industry specialist
that back doors will be a bigger boon to hackers and to our nation’s
enemies than publishing our nuclear codes and giving the keys to all of
our military weapons to the Russians and the Chinese, our government has
chosen, once again, not to listen to the minds that have created the
glue that holds this world together.
This is a black day and the
beginning of the end of the US as a world power. The government has
ordered a disarmament of our already ancient cybersecurity and
cyberdefense systems, and it is asking us to take a walk into that near
horizon where cyberwar is unquestionably waiting, with nothing more than
harsh words as a weapon and the hope that our enemies will take pity at
our unarmed condition and treat us fairly.
Any student of world
history will tell you that this is a dream. Would Hitler have stopped
invading Poland if the Polish people had sweetly asked him not to do so?
Those who think yes should stand strongly by Hillary Clinton’s side,
whose cybersecurity platform includes negotiating with the Chinese so
they will no longer launch cyberattacks against us.
The FBI, in a laughable and
bizarre twist of logic, said the back door would be used only once and
only in the San Bernardino case.
Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, replied:
The government suggests
this tool could only be used once, on one phone. But that’s simply not
true. Once created, the technique could be used over and over again, on
any number of devices. In the physical world, it would be the equivalent
of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks —
from restaurants and banks to stores and homes. No reasonable person
would find that acceptable.
The government is asking
Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security
advancements that protect our customers — including tens of millions of
American citizens — from sophisticated hackers and cybercriminals. The
same engineers who built strong encryption into the iPhone to protect
our users would, ironically, be ordered to weaken those protections and
make our users less safe.
No matter how you slice
this pie, if the government succeeds in getting this back door, it will
eventually get a back door into all encryption, and our world, as we
know it, is over. In spite of the FBI’s claim that it would protect the
back door, we all know that’s impossible. There are bad apples
everywhere, and there only needs to be in the US government. Then a few
million dollars, some beautiful women (or men), and a yacht trip to the
Caribbean might be all it takes for our enemies to have full access to
our secrets.
Cook said:
source
The FBI may use different
words to describe this tool, but make no mistake: Building a version of
iOS that bypasses security in this way would undeniably create a
backdoor. And while the government may argue that its use would be
limited to this case, there is no way to guarantee such control.
The fundamental question is
this: Why can’t the FBI crack the encryption on its own? It has the
full resources of the best the US government can provide.
With all due respect to Tim
Cook and Apple, I work with a team of the best hackers on the planet.
These hackers attend Defcon in Las Vegas, and they are legends in their
local hacking groups, such as HackMiami. They are all prodigies, with
talents that defy normal human comprehension. About 75% are social
engineers. The remainder are hardcore coders. I would eat my shoe on the
Neil Cavuto show if we could not break the encryption on the San
Bernardino phone. This is a pure and simple fact.
And why do the best hackers
on the planet not work for the FBI? Because the FBI will not hire
anyone with a 24-inch purple mohawk, 10-gauge ear piercings, and a
tattooed face who demands to smoke weed while working and won’t work for
less than a half-million dollars a year. But you bet your ass that the
Chinese and Russians are hiring similar people with similar demands and
have been for many years. It’s why we are decades behind in the cyber
race.
Cyberscience is not just
something you can learn. It is an innate talent. The Juilliard school of
music cannot create a Mozart. A Mozart or a Bach, much like our modern
hacking community, is genetically created. A room full of Stanford
computer science graduates cannot compete with a true hacker without
even a high-school education.
So here is my offer to the
FBI. I will, free of charge, decrypt the information on the San
Bernardino phone, with my team. We will primarily use social
engineering, and it will take us three weeks. If you accept my offer,
then you will not need to ask Apple to place a back door in its product,
which will be the beginning of the end of America.
If you doubt my credentials, Google
“cybersecurity legend” and see whose name is the only name that appears
in the first 10 results out of more than a quarter of a million.
Make
no mistake that this is one of the most epic battles in the history of
privacy, as the decisions that are reached in this case will reverberate
throughout the world and have far reaching consequences. There is a
fundamental battle taking place as to whether an individual has a right
to privacy or, if as the U.S. government is asserting; privacy is a
privilege bestowed upon individuals at the behest of the government.+
Ironically, privacy is considered a fundamental human right as recognized
in the UN Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights and in many other international and regional
treaties. Privacy is the lynchpin of human dignity and many other key
values such as freedom of association and freedom of speech have their
roots in privacy.
When the U.S. government
works to undermine what is considered a fundamental human right by most
of the world, perhaps it’s time to seriously question why those elected
to represent the people are actively working to undermine the rights of
those that put them in office.
source
No comments:
Post a Comment